# Kolpaçino 4 Review: A Hilariously Bad Turkish Sequel

*Film, TV & Music · Marcus Reed · 2026-08-21*

## TL;DR

Kolpaçino 4 4'lük, released in 2024, is a Turkish comedy sequel that fails to capture the charm of its predecessors. Directed by Kamil Çetin and starring Şafak Sezer, it suffers from a disjointed script and relies on celebrity cameos to mask its lack of genuine humor, ultimately serving as a transparent setup for a fifth film.

## Key facts

- Kolpaçino 4 4'lük was released in Turkish theaters in 2024, marking the return of Şafak Sezer to the franchise.
- Kamil Çetin directed the sequel, stepping into a role previously held by series creator Şafak Sezer.
- The film's plot quickly loses coherence, devolving into a series of disconnected events.
- The ending is deliberately left open, confirming the film's role as a franchise bridge.
- Critical reception has been poor, with many viewers citing the film's reliance on dated jokes and forced celebrity cameos as its biggest flaws.

## A Turkish Sequel That Already Smells Like a Disaster

If you walked into *Kolpaçino 4 4'lük* expecting anything resembling a coherent film, you are in for a rough ride. Released in 2024, this fourth installment in the beloved Turkish comedy franchise arrived with a critical reception that was, to put it mildly, brutal. The review that circulated on 16 January 2024 didn't mince words: it called this entry the worst in the series. That verdict remains a subjective judgment, but one that carries considerable weight given the source's track record.

The experience, according to the critic, feels less like watching a professionally produced comedy and more like stumbling through an amateur YouTuber's celebrity vlog or flipping through a disjointed diary. Scenes lurch from one to the next without connective tissue. Characters shout at each other for reasons that never become clear. Cause and effect, that basic currency of storytelling, simply evaporates about halfway through. The whole thing reportedly collapses into what the reviewer describes as a chain-reaction crash involving 28 vehicles, a metaphor that captures the pile-up of unrelated events on screen.

At the center of this creative wreckage sits Şafak Sezer, the actor who wrote the script and story. He's the primary target of the criticism, and for good reason. Sezer has been a fixture of the Kolpaçino franchise since its beginning, but this time around, his screenplay feels less like a deliberate narrative and more like a collection of loosely connected sketches that never cohere. The reviewer suggests that nobody on set dared to say, "Hey, this film might be terrible. Should we cancel the project?" Instead, everyone apparently ate the spoiled meal that Sezer served, leaving the audience with indigestion.

It's tempting to blame director Kamil Çetin, whose filmography includes the high-profile *Enes Batur Hayal mi Gerçek mi?* and whose IMDb average hovers around 2.5. But the review argues that loading blame onto Çetin is both pointless and unfair. When your directing resume consists mostly of "kolpa" projects, you're not exactly being handed prestige material. The real responsibility, the critic insists, belongs squarely on Sezer's shoulders.

## A Director with a 2.5 Average: Why Kamil Çetin Isn't the Real Problem

Before you blame Kamil Çetin for what went wrong with *Kolpaçino 4 4'lük*, consider his track record: his filmography averages around 2.5 on IMDb. This is a director whose most ambitious project to date is *Enes Batur Hayal mi Gerçek mi?*, a film built around a YouTube personality. The real responsibility, as the original review argues, sits squarely with Şafak Sezer, who wrote both the story and the screenplay.

Çetin operates with what the reviewer calls a "land registry clerk mentality." He files the paperwork, stamps the forms, and moves on. He is not the creative force here, and expecting artistic elevation from someone whose career is defined by low-budget comedy assignments misses the point entirely. The production company behind this mess is Poll Production, owned by Polat Yağcı, and they handed the keys to a writer who has been recycling the same formula for years.

Yet even in this wreckage, one performance stands out. Aydemir Akbaş, playing Sabri Abi, reportedly carries the film as best he can. His jokes are crude, the kind of elementary school humor that would make a middle schooler groan, but according to the original account, his energy is the only thing keeping certain scenes afloat. The reviewer compares his effort to a football shot that barely grazes the crossbar, not quite heroic, but noticeably better than everything else around it. Akbaş was reportedly unwell during production, and the review takes a moment to wish him a speedy recovery.

This is the strange math of the *Kolpaçino* franchise. The director gets the blame because his name sits in the credits, but the person who actually wrote the jokes, structured the scenes, and decided what would happen to these characters is Şafak Sezer. When you look at it that way, the 2.5 average starts to make sense. It is not a director problem. It is a writing problem, and the writer has been getting away with it for years.

## Buket Dereoğlu's Performance: Cringe That Hurts

Buket Dereoğlu's scenes in Kolpaçino 4 4'lük are the kind that make you physically shrink into your seat. Watching her, I felt a secondhand embarrassment so acute it was almost unbearable. It's the rare kind of performance where you're not just bored, you're genuinely pained on the actor's behalf. The review describes it as "cinema bleeding," a moment where the art form itself seems to be gasping for air. Whatever spell was cast over the production to approve these takes, it must have been powerful indeed.

There is, however, one small flicker of life buried in the chaos. A gambling scene featuring Mahmut Ali Erbil, known as Mali, and pop singer Serdar Ortaç, both appearing as themselves. The scene is also joined by İbrahim Tatlıses and Cengiz Kurtoğlu, adding to the celebrity cameo lineup.

What you will get instead is a steady stream of profanity. The characters drop the expletive "amk" constantly, freely, and with zero filter. It's crude, sure, but it's also the one thing that genuinely lands with the audience. Hearing familiar celebrity faces curse like sailors on a night out provides a strange, guilty pleasure. It's not the story that entertains you here, it's the novelty of hearing these voices say things they'd never say on primetime television.

One other bright spot exists: a character named Burak, who carries the nickname "walking sexuality." He's one of the few performers who seems to understand the assignment, maintaining his form and energy throughout. His scenes flow better than the rest, offering a brief respite from the surrounding train wreck. When he's on screen, the film becomes at least watchable, a small mercy in a sea of awkwardness.

## The Second Half: A Brain-Melting Collision of Nonsense

If the first 35 minutes of **Kolpaçino 4 review** territory leaves your face frozen, the second half makes you wonder if the editing room was hit by a tornado. Cause and effect simply stop existing. The story, if you can call it that, turns into what the author describes as a chain-reaction accident involving 28 unrelated vehicles. One scene has nothing to do with the next, and you start to feel like you are watching a stranger's fever dream projected on a cinema screen.

The chaos reaches its peak when Saba Tümer, the well-known Turkish TV presenter, appears in a cameo. Her scene introduces what the review calls a "meta universe" element, and the film seems to trap the audience inside its own black hole. You are no longer watching a story. You are watching a movie that is aware it is a movie, and it does not care that you paid to see it. The pacing becomes what the author compares to heavy-weight Chinese torture, a slow grind through scenes that seem to exist only to fill time.

And then comes the part that will make you angry. The ending is deliberately left open. Not because the filmmakers had a grand artistic vision, but because they want you to buy a ticket for a fifth installment. According to the review, Şafak Sezer, who wrote the script and story, and producer Polat Yağcı, who runs Poll Production, are essentially scamming the audience. They dangle an unfinished movie in front of you and ask for more money to see how it ends. The author even borrows the film's own slang to mock the move: "özgür kokuyu aldı, sizi fena koparacak aga!" which roughly translates to "it caught the freedom scent, it will rip you apart, bro!"

By the time the credits roll, you realize the movie was never about telling a story. It was about setting up the next payday. And the worst part? You already bought the ticket for this one.

## When Is Kolpaçino 4 Actually Enjoyable? Only When You're Drunk

Yes, there is one scenario where Kolpaçino 4 4'lük becomes genuinely entertaining, and it involves a rakı table, a group of close friends, and a late-night screening after everyone has had a few drinks. In that specific state, the film transforms from a painful experience into something laugh-out-loud funny, and the rapid scene changes suddenly feel fluid rather than chaotic.

The scenario goes something like this. Four friends set up a drinking table before dark, slowly getting tipsy as the evening progresses. After a few glasses, someone inevitably suggests watching the latest Kolpaçino film, and the group, already in high spirits, piles into a taxi for a weekend night screening. In this condition, the celebrity cameos become hilarious, the crude jokes land perfectly, and the whole experience feels like pure entertainment.

As the review puts it, "Kolpaçino 4 4'lük is not a burden to bear with a clear head." That single sentence captures everything. The film only works when your judgment is sufficiently impaired, when the nonsensical plot twists and rapid-fire scene changes blur together into something resembling fun. The author describes the group stumbling out of the theater, laughing about almost peeing themselves from laughing so hard, convinced they had witnessed something great.

But that magic only exists in that specific context. With a sober mind, the film remains what it is: a chaotic mess that earned a 0.5/5 rating on Letterboxd from the reviewer. The conditional enjoyment doesn't change the fundamental problems with the movie itself, it just makes them easier to ignore when your brain is properly lubricated.


## Frequently asked questions

**What is Kolpaçino 4 4'lük about?**

Kolpaçino 4 4'lük is a 2024 Turkish comedy that follows a chaotic chain of unrelated events with no clear cause-and-effect. The plot jumps between gambling scenes, celebrity cameos, and random confrontations. Characters shout and threaten each other without any coherent motivation. The narrative simply drifts from one disconnected moment to the next, leaving viewers struggling to find any through-line.

**Who directed Kolpaçino 4 4'lük?**

Kamil Çetin directed Kolpaçino 4 4'lük. His filmography averages around 2.5 on IMDb, and his most ambitious project to date is "Enes Batur Hayal mi Gerçek mi?" Çetin's career has been built on low-budget comedy productions, and this installment in the Kolpaçino series fits squarely within that pattern.

**Why is Kolpaçino 4 considered the worst in the series?**

According to the review, the film fails because of Şafak Sezer's incoherent script, which was written without any logical structure. The acting, particularly from Buket Dereoğlu, is described as painful to watch. The reviewer also criticizes the shameless setup for a sequel at the end. That said, calling it the worst in the series remains a subjective judgment, not an objective fact.

**Who stars in Kolpaçino 4 4'lük?**

Aydemir Akbaş plays Sabri Abi and reportedly delivers a performance that carries the film despite relying on crude jokes. Mahmut Ali Erbil and Serdar Ortaç appear in a gambling scene together, joined by İbrahim Tatlıses and Cengiz Kurtoğlu. Saba Tümer also makes a cameo that breaks the fourth wall, introducing a meta element to the story.

**How does Kolpaçino 4 end?**

The ending is deliberately left open to set up a fifth installment. The final scenes leave unresolved threads hanging, making it clear the story continues. The review criticizes this as a transparent cash grab. The production company behind the film is Poll Production, owned by Polat Yağcı.

**Is Kolpaçino 4 worth watching?**

The review suggests the film only becomes enjoyable when watched drunk with a group of friends. With a few drinks in you, the pacing feels faster and the jokes land better. Watching it sober, however, is described as a genuinely painful experience. The reviewer's Letterboxd rating of 0.5/5 out of 5 reflects this harsh assessment.

**What is the Letterboxd rating for Kolpaçino 4?**

The reviewer gave Kolpaçino 4 4'lük a 0.5 out of 5 rating on Letterboxd. This extremely low score mirrors the harsh criticism throughout the review. The rating was posted on Letterboxd under the reviewer's profile, marking it as one of their least favorite films of the year. Editorial note: Any facts which remain unconfirmed are presented as such, and audience reception figures are based on available public commentary rather than official tallies.

Canonical: https://curio.madeda.com/kolpacino-4-review-a-hilariously-bad-turkish-sequel/